Diets can kill. Not just figuratively.

When Jenny McCarthy recently revealed that her vegan lifestyle nearly led to her death, it sparked yet another wave in the never-ending battle of dietary ideologies. The 52-year-old judge and television personality didn't just experience minor discomfort. Her plant-based regimen, combined with celiac disease, dairy intolerance, and soy allergy, created a perfect storm that threatened her life.

Her solution? A complete reversal of the carnivore diet, consisting exclusively of animal products. The pendulum swung fully to the opposite extreme.

This dramatic dietary pivot raises profound questions about nutrition dogma, personalized health needs, and the dangers of absolutist thinking in our approach to food. It also highlights a troubling pattern where nutrition becomes less about science and more about identity.

When Plants Attack

McCarthy's experience isn't isolated. For some individuals with specific health conditions, plant-based diets can exacerbate existing problems rather than solve them. While the vegan diet is beneficial for many, it presents unique challenges for those with certain digestive disorders, allergies, or autoimmune conditions.

Celiac disease already eliminates numerous plant-based protein sources. Add dairy intolerance and soy allergies, and the nutritional landscape becomes treacherously narrow. In McCarthy's case, these restrictions created a nutritional minefield where proper nourishment became nearly impossible.

The narrative that plant-based diets are universally superior ignores a fundamental truth: human bodies are complex and varied. What nourishes one person can harm another.

The Carnivore Counterrevolution

The carnivore diet represents the antithesis of veganism. Proponents consume only animal products: meat, fish, eggs, and some dairy. No plants whatsoever.

This approach provided relief for McCarthy. Others report similar experiences, particularly those with autoimmune conditions, digestive disorders, or food sensitivities. They describe reduced inflammation, improved mental clarity, and resolution of chronic symptoms that conventional approaches failed to address.

A study of over 2,000 adults who followed the carnivore diet for over a year found no adverse cardiovascular effects, challenging some conventional nutritional wisdom. However, participants did report digestive adjustments, particularly in the initial phases.

The carnivore approach has gained traction through prominent advocates like Jordan Peterson and his daughter Mikhayla, who credit it with resolving severe autoimmune issues. Their anecdotal evidence has inspired thousands to experiment with this controversial approach.

The Scientific Red Flags

Medical experts express serious concerns about the carnivore diet's long-term viability. Eliminating fiber-rich plants disrupts the gut microbiome, potentially leading to digestive distress, including bloating, constipation, and diarrhea.

Kidney specialists warn about an increased risk of kidney stones from the high protein load. Cardiologists point to potential cholesterol elevations and cardiovascular risks from sustained high intake of animal fats.

Perhaps most concerning is the absence of numerous plant compounds with established health benefits. Phytonutrients, polyphenols, and antioxidants are crucial in cellular protection and disease prevention. Their elimination represents an unknown long-term risk.

The absence of dietary fiber also raises questions about colon health and cancer risk, though long-term studies on carnivore diets remain limited.

However, almost all of these concerns are based on nutrition dogma and not on research science or anthropological evidence. They go against basic physiology, human intestinal design, and cellular biology.

Beyond the Binary

The McCarthy case illustrates a broader problem in nutrition discourse: the false binary between plant-exclusive and animal-exclusive approaches.

Human dietary adaptation has always been characterized by omnivorous flexibility. Our ancestors ate what was available, adapting to environments ranging from Arctic regions to tropical forests. This adaptability is reflected in our digestive physiology, which accommodates various foods.

The polarization of diet into moral and identity-based camps obscures this evolutionary context. It transforms eating from a biological necessity into an ideological battleground where nuance and individuality become casualties.

Most concerning is how this polarization affects those with genuine medical conditions. When diet becomes dogma, people suffering real symptoms may delay seeking appropriate care out of commitment to a particular dietary identity.

The Personalization Revolution

The future of nutrition likely lies not in universal prescriptions but in personalized approaches. Emerging research in nutrigenomics and microbiome science suggests that optimal diets vary significantly between individuals based on genetic factors, gut bacteria composition, lifestyle, and pre-existing conditions.

McCarthy's experience dramatically demonstrates this principle. Her specific combination of celiac disease, dairy intolerance, and soy allergy created a unique nutritional landscape that standard recommendations failed to address.

This personalization extends beyond medical conditions. Activity levels, metabolic health, age, and even geographic ancestry influence how we process different foods. The one-size-fits-all approach increasingly appears outdated as science reveals the complexity of human nutritional needs.

Finding Middle Ground

Between the extremes of veganism and carnivore diets lies a vast middle territory where most humans throughout history have thrived. This middle path emphasizes food quality over rigid categorization, focusing on nutrient density and individual response rather than ideological purity.

For those with specific health conditions, temporary elimination diets followed by careful reintroduction can identify problematic foods without unnecessary restrictions. This methodical approach allows for personalization without dogma.

The McCarthy case serves as both a caution and an opportunity. It cautions against blind adherence to any dietary system without considering individual factors. It offers a chance to move beyond tribalism toward a more nuanced understanding of nutrition.

The most valuable dietary advice may be the least tweet-worthy: pay attention to your body, prioritize whole foods, maintain diversity, and adjust based on your unique needs and responses. This approach lacks the marketing appeal of revolutionary diets but better reflects biological reality.

As nutrition science evolves, the path forward appears not in finding the perfect human diet, but in developing better tools to match individuals with their optimal nutritional approach. Until then, extremes on either end of the spectrum deserve healthy skepticism, regardless of their passionate advocates.

McCarthy's lesson isn't that everyone should abandon plants or embrace meat. Listening to your body sometimes matters more than listening to dietary dogma, whatever form it takes.

Stay Well,

Marc

P.S. Don't hesitate to reach out if you’re curious about how these insights apply to your situation. I’m here to support you on your journey to optimal health. For personalized guidance, consider joining my Coaching Program for only $10 monthly at Metabolic Health Coach.

Join my free newsletter: https://metabolichealth.beehiiv.com

Let Marc Bates Guide You to Metabolic Health Success!

Whether you’re exploring a low-carb, high-fat lifestyle for the first time or are already on the path and looking to refine your approach, this program is designed to prepare you for success.

Join a supportive community of individuals transforming their health—from beginners to those who’ve already experienced incredible results. You’ll receive clear, actionable information that’s easy to implement, and you’ll have the unique opportunity to connect with Marc Bates during weekly live Q&A sessions to get personalized guidance.

Eliminate the guesswork and take the next step toward lasting health and vitality with Marc by your side!

Here’s What is Included:

#1 Join Marc Bates for the Weekly Metabolic Health Q&A Call! This is your opportunity to ask questions, share updates about your health journey, and gain insights from others transforming their lives. Can’t join live? Don’t worry—you’ll receive access to the full recording!

#2 Access to Our Exclusive Members' Portal

Unlock everything you need to succeed on your journey to metabolic health with Marc Bates, Metabolic Health Coach. Our membership website offers an easy-to-navigate portal featuring over 30 in-depth learning modules, with new content added every week!

Stay informed and empowered with

Weekly updates to learning modules

Short, focused videos on essential health topics

Downloadable eBooks to deepen your understanding

This growing resource is your one-stop hub for reliable, actionable guidance on achieving lasting health and vitality.

#3 Support From Marc Bates & a Like-Minded Community

Connect directly with Marc Bates and a supportive community committed to transforming their metabolic health. We use a private Facebook Group to facilitate easy communication, creating a dynamic, interactive space for support and learning.

Ask questions, share your experiences, and receive real-time guidance while building connections with others who share your goals. Together, we’ll help you stay informed, motivated, and on track to achieving lasting health and vitality.

Disclaimer:

Not Medical or Dietary Advice The content on the newsletter is not to be considered medical advice, and nothing herein is intended to provide or act as a substitute for physical or mental health treatment, or provide you with a medical diagnosis, treatment, or any other relevant services.  For more information, please visit: Disclaimer - Optimal Human Diet and Lifestyle